It’s true that WatchGuard Technologies firewalls are a trusted network security solution across the board, but that doesn’t mean each model is a one-size-fits-all. Focusing on a comparison between the WatchGuard M290 vs M295, the fine print highlights what makes each of them unique.
Aside from the fact that both models are reliable for small business network security, the datasheets highlight some important differences here. On top of that, it’s important to understand that the M295 builds on what the M290 brings to the table, ensuring businesses are future-proof to evolving cybersecurity threats.
The M290 isn’t facing its end of life (EOL) any time soon, but it’s always better to be prepared for upgrades when the time comes. In this article, you’ll get a streamlined look at this firewall comparison of WatchGuard M290 vs M295 to discover what actually sets them apart.
Evolving WatchGuard Firebox Solutions That are Future-Proof
If you know anything about the network security market, then you know WatchGuard isn’t new to the arena. They’ve delivered stellar firewall appliances to businesses for years, and the M295 is just another upgrade to the list.
Bringing a new generation of firewall hardware to market isn’t just about end-of-life WatchGuard warnings, but being prepared for how the cybersecurity landscape changes. On the other side, this doesn’t inherently mean the M290 isn’t built for the job, but that navigating this space with some hindsight is crucial. Whether you’re transitioning from the M290 or looking for your first firewall from WatchGuard, this comparison will put your sights where they need to be.
What is the WatchGuard Firebox M290?
Focusing on small to mid-size businesses, the WatchGuard Firebox M290 is a powerhouse on its own, rated for 51 to 100 users on a network. Don’t mistake its target market for small-range performance, as it’s more than capable of enterprise-grade security.
Here’s a quick look at some of the most important specifications:
- Firewall Throughput: Up to 5.8 Gbps
- VPN Throughput: Up to 2.4 Gbps
- IPS Throughput: 1.3 Gbps
- Antivirus Throughput: 1.47 Gbps
- Concurrent Connections: 3,500,000
This is pretty solid as is, but in due time, even these specifications won’t match the needs of a growing operation. As always, this is especially true as security demands continue to rise, facing the evolving issues of cyber risks. Helping to lead growing businesses into the future of network security, you’ll see where the M295 makes its mark in comparison.
What is the WatchGuard M295?
Remember, the hardware model number doesn’t automatically mean better. It’s always about aligning your network security needs with the right specs. With a quick glance, you’ll be able to see how the M295 compares to the M290 on multiple levels.
Here are those same spec categories for the WatchGuard M295:
- Firewall Throughput: Up to 7.9 Gbps
- VPN Throughput: Up to 5.8 Gbps
- IPS Throughput: 2.41 Gbps
- Antivirus Throughput: 3 Gbps
- Concurrent Connections: 6,000,000
While these aren’t the only details that matter in firewall hardware, these categories are a helpful reference in how the two compare. At the end of the day, it can’t be argued that the M295 is a bit stronger in performance capability.
Comparing the WatchGuard M290 vs M295
In the same vein, plenty of other details from the datasheets matter when it comes to the full scope of your decision-making. Throughput capabilities might be a leading factor, but details like interfacing and connection capacity matter just as much. Take a look at the table below to get a more thorough look at both of these firewall models from WatchGuard.
| Specifications | WatchGuard M290 | WatchGuard M295 |
|---|---|---|
| Firewall Throughput (Gbps) | 5.8 | 7.9 |
| VPN Throughput (Gbps) | 2.4 | 5.8 |
| IPS Throughput (Gbps) | 1.3 | 2.41 |
| Antivirus Throughput (Gbps) | 1.47 | 3 |
| Concurrent Connections | 3,500,000 | 6,000,000 |
| VLANs | 100 | Unrestricted |
| VPN Tunnels | 75 | 100 |
| Network Interfaces | 8 x 1 Gb | 4 x 2.5 Gb 4 x 1 Gb 2 x SFP+ |
| I/O Interfaces | 1 Serial 2 USB | 1 Serial 2 USB-A 3.2 |
For those looking for a smooth hardware transition or an overall scalable solution from WatchGuard, the M295 isn’t a bad way to go. Firewall comparisons like these are crucial for making sure your network security stack stays aligned with your operation as a whole. That’s part of what makes this new release from WatchGuard so great. They continue to make scaling simplified without having to overhaul your firewall hardware as a whole.
The Bottom Line
Considering the success of the M290 in recent years, it only makes sense that WatchGuard would keep the ball rolling by introducing a new model. From a specification’s standpoint, the M295 is clearly the better long-term solution here.
While the M290 will remain a dependable choice for quite some time, it never hurts to prepare your network security for what’s to come down the road. Come have a chat with us at Firewalls to learn more about both of these firewall models and how to keep your business network security future-proof.
FAQ
What are the Main Differences Between WatchGuard M290 vs M295?
You’ll find that the biggest difference is in overall throughput performance, whether it’s VPN, Antivirus, or IPS throughput, for example. However, both models support the same range of 51 to 100 users.
Is the WatchGuard M290 Being Discontinued?
While the WatchGuard Firebox M290 will eventually face an EOL date, there is no official announcement from the security manufacturer at this time.
Which Firewall is Better for Growing SMBs?
If you’re expecting increased traffic or simply looking to future-proof your network, the M295 is the better long-term network security solution.
Do Both the M290 and M295 Support the Same Security Suites?
Yes, both WatchGuard Firebox models are compatible with the Basic and Total Security Suite licenses.
Can I Easily Upgrade From the M290 to the M295?
Most definitely, as WatchGuard has made upgrading seamless through familiar deployment and management tools. You’ll end up with new hardware, but you won’t have to go through any kind of massive learning curve or downtime.
